<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Arménio Rego</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">A.I. Melo</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Dustin Bluhm</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Dálcio Reis Junior</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Leader-Expressed Humility Predicting Team Psychological Safety: A Personality Dynamics Lens</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Journal of Business Ethics</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2021</style></year></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">174</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">669–686</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Arménio Rego</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Regina Leite</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Teresa Carvalho</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carla Freire</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">A. Vieira</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Organizational Commitment: Toward a Different Understanding of the Ways People Feel Attached to Their Organizations</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Management Research</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2004</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1 October 2004</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/15365430480000510/full/html</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">201–218</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;This paper aims to contribute to the understanding of the three‐dimensional model of organizational commitment proposed by Meyer and Allen (e.g., 1991). It focuses on whether continuance commitment should be considered one‐dimensional or bidimensional (low alternatives; high sacrifices). Whether affective commitment should be divided into two components (affective commitment; future in common) or if it should remain as a one‐dimensional construct is also discussed. The paper also considers a “new” factor identified by Rego (2003), which he named “psychological absence”, but which we denominated here as accommodating commitment. Besides the confirmatory factor analysis, the paper shows how four dimensions of organizational justice (distributive, procedural, interpersonal, and informational) explain organizational commitment. The sample comprises 366 individuals from 22 organizations operating in Portugal. The predictive value of the justice perceptions for both instrumental commitment components is quite weak, despite ranging from 25 per cent to 36 per cent for the other components. Procedural and interpersonal justice are the main predictors. The accommodating dimension improves the fit indices of the factorial model, but its meaning is not clear. It is also not clear whether one should consider it as a new component of commitment or whether its items should be removed from the measuring instruments. The findings suggest that some gains can be achieved in the partition of the affective and instrumental commitment, but further research is necessary to clarify the issue.&lt;/p&gt;
</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></issue><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">201</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Arménio Rego</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Teresa Carvalho</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Regina Leite</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carla Freire</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">A. Vieira</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Empenhamento(s) organizacional(is): Dois laços afectivos, dois instrumentais, um normativo e um de ausência</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Comportamento Organizacional e Gestão</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ausência de alternativas</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ausência psicológica</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Empenhamento afectivo</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Empenhamento normativo</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Futuro comum</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sacrifícios elevados</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2004</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://repositorio.ispa.pt/handle/10400.12/4781</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">207–226</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Este artigo visa testar um hexa-modelo dimensional do empenhamento organizacional sugerido em pesquisas anteriores de Rego (2002b, 2003). O modelo difere do esquema tri-dimensional mais comum (afectivo, normativo e instrumental) no que concerne a três aspectos: a) a faceta afectiva é desmembrada em duas (empenhamento afectivo; futuro comum); b) a faceta instrumental é dividida nas facetas “escassez de alternativas” e “sacrifícios elevados”; c) é sugerida uma nova dimensão, designada “ausência psicológica” e que representa o “grau zero” do empenhamento. A amostra é constituída por 366 indivíduos, com actividades profissionais bastante distintas. Análises factoriais confirmatórias sugerem que o modelo de seis dimensões se ajusta satisfatoriamente aos dados, embora os modelos de quatro e cinco dimensões denotem igualmente boas qualidades psicométricas.&lt;/p&gt;
</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></issue><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">207</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Arménio Rego</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Teresa Carvalho</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Enfermeiros empenhados nas suas organizações: A relevância das ‘rosas’</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Revista de Administração Pública</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2002</style></year></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">36</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">959–979</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6</style></issue><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">959</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Arménio Rego</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Teresa Carvalho</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Motivos de sucesso, afiliação e poder: evidência confirmatória do constructo</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">afiliação</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">desempenho dos estudantes universitários</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">dificuldade percebida</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">motivos</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">poder</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">sucesso</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2002</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Apr 2002</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://www.scielo.br/j/ptp/a/PvRS7vcm6BFJgBhKzL7SdZK/?lang=pt</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">18</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">17–26</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;O artigo expõe evidência confirmatória de validação do instrumento de medida dos motivos de sucesso, afiliação e poder proposto por Rego (2000). A amostra inclui 342 estudantes do ensino superior. Os dados sugerem o seguinte: a) o modelo tri-dimensional ajusta-se satisfatoriamente aos dados; b) os alphas são superiores a 0.70; c) tal como sugerido pela teoria, o motivo afiliativo relaciona-se negativamente com o desempenho dos estudantes; d) o motivo de sucesso explica o desempenho especialmente em condições de dificuldade intermédia; e) não se confirma a hipótese de o motivo de poder explicar o desempenho de estudantes com percepções de dificuldade elevada; f) os poderes explicativos dos motivos para o desempenho são baixos; g) o perfil motivacional traçado para a amostra converge com o descrito por pesquisas anteriores incidentes sobre populações portuguesas. Genericamente, a evidência empírica acalenta algum otimismo acerca das propriedades psicométricas do instrumento, mas estudos adicionais de validação são necessários.&lt;/p&gt;
</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></issue><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">17</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Arménio Rego</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Teresa Carvalho</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The Achievement, affiliation and power motives: A confirmatory study of the three factor model. </style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Journal of Applied Psychology (Angewandte Psychologie)</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2001</style></year></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">89–104</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4</style></issue><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">89</style></section></record></records></xml>